GD Culture Group Limited (GDC)

Nasdaq: GDC · Wholesale-Metals & Minerals (No Petroleum) · Jersey City, NJ · filing with the SEC since 2015

Full chart Alerts Compare

Grade2.4

◀ Past 1.1● Present 2.4▶ Future 3.5

3 est.

Overview Business Financials Grade Forecast Sentiment Ownership People Filings Patents Chart

The grade of GD Culture Group Limited

Nine metrics read from its own filings, by tense

Headline grade

2.4/10

◀ Past1.125% of the headline

● Present2.445% of the headline

▶ Future3.530% of the headline

All three tenses have at least two readings, so the archetype blend applies as printed.

Of the nine metrics, 6 read as filed from the record and 3 are SI estimates, each with its reasoning, its confidence and what would change it on its card.

◀ Past

What did they actually do?

1.1/1025% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Surviving crises

as filed

1.4/10

Has it survived what it has been through?

22 warning events since 2017; the latest 2026-01-29.

weight 45% of this tense · 14th percentile among 51 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

GD Culture Group Limited's filings since 2017 show 22 warning events of 3 kinds: a notice about its exchange listing (8-K item 3.01, 11 times, the latest 2025-03-21); an auditor change (8-K item 4.01, 6 times, the latest 2026-01-29); a late-report notice (Form NT 10-K or NT 10-Q, 5 times, the latest 2024-05-15) (its current reports).

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Track record

as filed

1.1/10

What has it actually done, year after year?

-66.9% a year over 6 filed years; profitable in 3 of 6.

weight 33% of this tense · 11th percentile among 50 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

GD Culture Group Limited's 6 filed years say what it did: revenue went from $39 million in fiscal 2017 to $153 thousand in fiscal 2022, down 66.9% a year; it rose in 2 of 5 years; the deepest fall was 100% from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2022; net income was positive in 3 of 6 of those years (its annual reports).

What it rests on

revenue growth over the filed span-66.9%bottom 3% of its family
the share of years revenue rosebottom 15% of its family
the share of filed years with a profitbottom 23% of its family
the deepest fall from a revenue peak99.6%bottom 1% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Shareholder treatment

SI estimate

0.7/10

How has it treated the people who own it?

SI estimate 0.7/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 22% of this tense · 7th percentile among 50 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: Read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 7% of 50 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
What the record cannot read: Fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
How it was reasoned: one part: the share count over the years, the one part on file, ranked among 50 in its family.
Confidence: 35 of 100
What would change it: A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: GD Culture Group Limited's shareholder treatment is put at 0.7 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 7% of 50 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

● Present

What are they doing right now?

2.4/1045% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Financial health

as filed

4.1/10

Is it financially healthy right now?

ROE -28%: lost 28¢ per shareholder dollar. Leverage 0%: owes 0¢ per asset dollar.

weight 33% of this tense · 41st percentile among 50 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Return on equity: in the fiscal year ended 2025-12-31, GD Culture Group Limited lost about 28 cents for every dollar of shareholders' money. Leverage: it owed about 0 cents per dollar of assets, and net share issuance: its share count grew 217.2% over the year (the filed statements).

What it rests on

what it owes per dollar of assetstop 1% of its family
return on equitybottom 16% of its family
the share count against the year beforebottom 9% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Industry position

as filed

0.1/10

How strong is its position in its industry?

bottom 1% of 51 in its family; net margin -20105.1%.

weight 45% of this tense · 1st percentile among 51 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

GD Culture Group Limited's standing among 51 graded names in its industry family: revenue of $153 thousand in fiscal 2022 ranks in the bottom 1% by size; a net margin of -20105.1% ranks in the bottom 1%; revenue growth of -80.1% a year over the last 3 filed years ranks in the bottom 1% (its annual reports).

What it rests on

revenue against the family$153,304bottom 1% of its family
net margin-20105.1%bottom 1% of its family
three-year revenue growth-80.1%bottom 1% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Leadership

SI estimate

4.7/10

What are the people in charge doing?

SI estimate 4.7/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).

weight 22% of this tense · 50th percentile among 36 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: No officer or director has filed a Form 3, 4 or 5 for it in the last fifteen months, so the years in charge cannot be read, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 36 members with one.
What the record cannot read: No officer or director has filed a Form 3, 4 or 5 for it in the last fifteen months, so the years in charge cannot be read.
How it was reasoned: family median, 36 readings behind it.
Confidence: 20 of 100
What would change it: Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: GD Culture Group Limited's leadership is put at 4.7 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because no officer or director has filed a Form 3, 4 or 5 for it in the last fifteen months, so the years in charge cannot be read, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 36 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

▶ Future

What are they set up to do next?

3.5/1030% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Room to expand

SI estimate

6.1/10

How much room does it have to grow?

SI estimate 6.1/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 33% of this tense · 61st percentile among 51 sector filers · read for itself

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: Read from one part only, cash less debt against assets, which ranks in the top 39% of 51 in its family; the record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue.
What the record cannot read: The record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue.
How it was reasoned: one part: cash less debt against assets, the one part on file, ranked among 51 in its family.
Confidence: 35 of 100
What would change it: A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: GD Culture Group Limited's room to expand is put at 6.1 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, cash less debt against assets, which ranks in the top 39% of 51 in its family; the record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

Growth drivers

as filed

3.6/10

What could actually drive growth from here?

bottom 36% of 50 in its family for growth drivers.

weight 33% of this tense · 36th percentile among 50 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

GD Culture Group Limited's growth drivers, from the filed years to fiscal 2022: revenue grew -80.1% a year over the last three filed years against -66.9% over all 6, slowing (bottom 23% of its family); the newest year grew -99.4% (bottom 1%); capital spending grew 32.2% a year (top 16%) (its annual reports). GD Culture Group Limited tags no split of its revenue by line in the annual report on file, so growth by line cannot be read here; research and capital spending are on the trend.

What it rests on

three-year growth against the whole span-13.2 points a yearbottom 23% of its family
the newest year's revenue growth-99.4%bottom 1% of its family
three-year growth of capital spending32.2%top 16% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Expectations vs reality

as filed

0.7/10

Did its newest year beat what its own record pointed to?

bottom 7% of 44 in its family for expectations against reality.

weight 33% of this tense · 7th percentile among 44 sector filers · read for its shareholders

From the record

GD Culture Group Limited's newest year against its own record: revenue of $153 thousand in fiscal 2022 came in 99.5% below the $28 million its prior three years' pace pointed to (bottom 1% of its family); net income of $31 million against a prior three-year average of $14 million (bottom 19%); a net margin of a loss larger than its revenue against 76.9% before (bottom 1%) (its annual reports).

What it rests on

revenue against the prior three years' pace-99.5%bottom 1% of its family
net income against the prior three years' average-124%bottom 19% of its family
net margin against its prior averagedown more than 100 pointsbottom 1% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

The grade is the company against its own industry, from its filings. It is not a view on the share price. How the grade is made

SI Assistanton GDC · research, not advice