All three tenses have at least two readings, so the archetype blend applies as printed.
Of the nine metrics, 2 read as filed from the record and 7 are SI estimates, each with its reasoning, its confidence and what would change it on its card.
What did they actually do?
Has it survived what it has been through?
4 warning events since 2017; the latest 2025-12-05.
From the record
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s filings since 2017 show 4 warning events: a notice about its exchange listing (8-K item 3.01, 4 times, the latest 2025-12-05) (its current reports).
A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.
What has it actually done, year after year?
SI estimate 4.9/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s track record is put at 4.9 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because fewer than three filed years of revenue on file, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 103 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
How has it treated the people who own it?
SI estimate 1.3/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s shareholder treatment is put at 1.3 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 13% of 146 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
What are they doing right now?
Is it financially healthy right now?
ROE -98%: lost 98¢ per shareholder dollar. Leverage 16%: owes 16¢ per asset dollar.
From the record
Return on equity: in the fiscal year ended 2025-12-31, Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. lost about 98 cents for every dollar of shareholders' money. Leverage: it owed about 16 cents per dollar of assets, and net share issuance: its share count grew 143.8% over the year (the filed statements).
What it rests on
A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.
How strong is its position in its industry?
SI estimate 4.9/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s industry position is put at 4.9 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because no filed revenue on file, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 102 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
What are the people in charge doing?
SI estimate 2.1/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s leadership is put at 2.1 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, officer and director changes on Form 8-K over three years, against the people in charge, which ranks in the bottom 21% of 137 in its family; the record of its people begins on 2023-06-29 (a listing, a merger or a first filing under the rules) and its chief executive and most of the people in charge have filed since then, so the record shows a floor of 3.4 years and cannot see past it; a floor under five years is not read as years in charge. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
What are they set up to do next?
How much room does it have to grow?
SI estimate 9.0/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s room to expand is put at 9.0 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, cash less debt against assets, which ranks in the top 10% of 152 in its family; the record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
What could actually drive growth from here?
SI estimate 4.9/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s growth drivers is put at 4.9 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because the record does not carry three filed years of revenue and two of the four parts: acceleration, the newest year's growth, the growth of research and of capital spending, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 101 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
Did its newest year beat what its own record pointed to?
SI estimate 5.1/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).
SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed
From the record
SI estimate, not a filed reading: Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.'s expectations vs reality is put at 5.1 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because the record does not carry four filed years of revenue and two of the three parts: revenue against the prior pace, earnings against the prior average, the margin change, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 73 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.
The grade is the company against its own industry, from its filings. It is not a view on the share price. How the grade is made