Company Analysis

Nutriband Inc. (NTRB)

Nasdaq: NTRB · Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies · Orlando, FL · filing with the SEC since 2016
Grade4.5
◀ Past 5.0● Present 4.6▶ Future 3.8
2 est.

The grade of Nutriband Inc.

Nine metrics read from its own filings, by tense
Headline grade
4.5/10
◀ Past5.030% of the headline
● Present4.640% of the headline
▶ Future3.830% of the headline

All three tenses have at least two readings, so the archetype blend applies as printed.

Of the nine metrics, 7 read as filed from the record and 2 are SI estimates, each with its reasoning, its confidence and what would change it on its card.

◀ Past

What did they actually do?

5.0/1030% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Surviving crises

as filed
4.8/10

Has it survived what it has been through?

6 warning events since 2017; the latest 2024-05-01.

weight 33% of this tense · 48th percentile among 29 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s filings since 2017 show 6 warning events: a late-report notice (Form NT 10-K or NT 10-Q, 6 times, the latest 2024-05-01) (its current reports).

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Track record

as filed
6.0/10

What has it actually done, year after year?

+35.3% a year over 8 filed years; profitable in 0 of 8.

weight 45% of this tense · 60th percentile among 25 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s 8 filed years say what it did: revenue went from $245 thousand in fiscal 2019 to $2 million in fiscal 2026, up 35.3% a year; it rose in 6 of 7 years; the deepest fall was 5% from fiscal 2025 to fiscal 2026; net income was positive in 0 of 8 of those years (its annual reports).

What it rests on

  • revenue growth over the filed span35.3%top 10% of its family
  • the share of years revenue rosetop 48% of its family
  • the share of filed years with a profitbottom 22% of its family
  • the deepest fall from a revenue peak4.8%top 26% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Shareholder treatment

SI estimate
3.3/10

How has it treated the people who own it?

SI estimate 3.3/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 22% of this tense · 33rd percentile among 26 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate
Read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 33% of 26 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
What the record cannot read
Fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
How it was reasoned
one part: the share count over the years, the one part on file, ranked among 26 in its family.
Confidence
35 of 100
What would change it
A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: Nutriband Inc.'s shareholder treatment is put at 3.3 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 33% of 26 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

● Present

What are they doing right now?

4.6/1040% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Financial health

as filed
4.5/10

Is it financially healthy right now?

ROE -123%: lost 123¢ per shareholder dollar. Leverage 12%: owes 12¢ per asset dollar.

weight 45% of this tense · 45th percentile among 27 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Return on equity: in the fiscal year ended 2026-01-31, Nutriband Inc. lost about 123 cents for every dollar of shareholders' money, and gross profitability: its products earned about 8 cents per dollar of everything the company owns. Leverage: it owed about 12 cents per dollar of assets, and net share issuance: its share count grew 9.7% over the year (the filed statements).

What it rests on

  • what it owes per dollar of assetstop 9% of its family
  • return on equitybottom 31% of its family
  • gross profit against assetsbottom 22% of its family
  • the share count against the year beforebottom 37% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Industry position

as filed
2.2/10

How strong is its position in its industry?

bottom 22% of 26 in its family; net margin -404.1%.

weight 33% of this tense · 22nd percentile among 26 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s standing among 26 graded names in its industry family: revenue of $2 million in fiscal 2026 ranks in the bottom 17% by size; a net margin of -404.1% ranks in the bottom 25%; revenue growth of -0.7% a year over the last 3 filed years ranks in the bottom 24% (its annual reports).

What it rests on

  • revenue against the family$2.0Mbottom 17% of its family
  • net margin-404.1%bottom 25% of its family
  • three-year revenue growth-0.7%bottom 24% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Leadership

SI estimate
8.5/10

What are the people in charge doing?

SI estimate 8.5/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 22% of this tense · 85th percentile among 23 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate
Read from one part only, the chief executive's years under the title, which ranks in the top 15% of 23 in its family; fewer than two of the three parts can be read: officer and director changes against the people in charge, the years the people in charge have been filing, the chief executive's years under the title.
What the record cannot read
Fewer than two of the three parts can be read: officer and director changes against the people in charge, the years the people in charge have been filing, the chief executive's years under the title.
How it was reasoned
one part: the chief executive's years on the record, the one part on file, ranked among 23 in its family.
Confidence
35 of 100
What would change it
A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: Nutriband Inc.'s leadership is put at 8.5 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, the chief executive's years under the title, which ranks in the top 15% of 23 in its family; fewer than two of the three parts can be read: officer and director changes against the people in charge, the years the people in charge have been filing, the chief executive's years under the title. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

▶ Future

What are they set up to do next?

3.8/1030% of the headline grade · 3 of 3 filed

Room to expand

as filed
5.3/10

How much room does it have to grow?

top 47% of 25 in its family for room to expand.

weight 45% of this tense · 53rd percentile among 25 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s room to grow, from the newest filed statements (fiscal 2026): cash of $5 million against no long-term debt tagged leaves 60.6% of its assets as net cash, top 9% of its family; cash from operations less capital spending is -252.4% of revenue (bottom 26%); a gross margin of 27.8% (bottom 14%); research spending of 92.9% of revenue (top 20%) (its annual report).

What it rests on

  • cash less debt against assets60.6%top 9% of its family
  • cash from operations less capital spending against revenue-252.4%bottom 26% of its family
  • gross margin27.8%bottom 14% of its family
  • research spending against revenue92.9%top 20% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Growth drivers

as filed
2.6/10

What could actually drive growth from here?

bottom 26% of 25 in its family for growth drivers.

weight 33% of this tense · 26th percentile among 25 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s growth drivers, from the filed years to fiscal 2026: revenue grew -0.7% a year over the last three filed years against 35.3% over all 8, slowing (bottom 2% of its family); the newest year grew -4.8% (bottom 14%); research spending grew 24.4% a year (top 19%); capital spending grew -59.3% a year (bottom 6%) (its annual reports). Nutriband Inc. tags no split of its revenue by line in the annual report on file, so growth by line cannot be read here; research and capital spending are on the trend.

What it rests on

  • three-year growth against the whole span-36.0 points a yearbottom 2% of its family
  • the newest year's revenue growth-4.8%bottom 14% of its family
  • three-year growth of research spending24.4%top 19% of its family
  • three-year growth of capital spending-59.3%bottom 6% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Expectations vs reality

as filed
2.8/10

Did its newest year beat what its own record pointed to?

bottom 28% of 23 in its family for expectations against reality.

weight 22% of this tense · 28th percentile among 23 sector filers · read for its shareholders

From the record

Nutriband Inc.'s newest year against its own record: revenue of $2 million in fiscal 2026 came in 6.2% below the $2 million its prior three years' pace pointed to (bottom 31% of its family); net income of $8 million against a prior three-year average of $7 million (bottom 37%); a net margin of a loss larger than its revenue against losses larger than its revenue before (bottom 15%) (its annual reports).

What it rests on

  • revenue against the prior three years' pace-6.2%bottom 31% of its family
  • net income against the prior three years' average-21%bottom 37% of its family
  • net margin against its prior average-81.2 pointsbottom 15% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

The grade is the company against its own industry, from its filings. It is not a view on the share price. How the grade is made

SI Assistanton NTRB · research, not advice