Q/C Technologies, Inc. (QCLS)

Nasdaq: QCLS · In Vitro & In Vivo Diagnostic Substances · New York, NY · filing with the SEC since 2005

Full chart Alerts Compare

Grade3.1

◀ Past 1.3● Present 2.5▶ Future 4.7

3 est.

Overview Business Financials Grade Forecast Sentiment Ownership People Filings Patents Chart

The grade of Q/C Technologies, Inc.

Nine metrics read from its own filings, by tense

Headline grade

3.1/10

◀ Past1.325% of the headline

● Present2.535% of the headline

▶ Future4.740% of the headline

All three tenses have at least two readings, so the archetype blend applies as printed.

Of the nine metrics, 6 read as filed from the record and 3 are SI estimates, each with its reasoning, its confidence and what would change it on its card.

◀ Past

What did they actually do?

1.3/1025% of the headline grade · 2 of 3 filed, 1 estimated

Surviving crises

as filed

0.3/10

Has it survived what it has been through?

20 warning events since 2017; the latest 2026-03-31.

weight 22% of this tense · 3rd percentile among 18 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s filings since 2017 show 20 warning events of 4 kinds: a notice about its exchange listing (8-K item 3.01, 7 times, the latest 2025-03-21); a warning not to rely on past financial statements (8-K item 4.02, the latest 2018-06-19); an auditor change (8-K item 4.01, 2 times, the latest 2026-03-13); a late-report notice (Form NT 10-K or NT 10-Q, 10 times, the latest 2026-03-31) (its current reports).

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Track record

as filed

2.1/10

What has it actually done, year after year?

-31.5% a year over 3 filed years; profitable in 0 of 3.

weight 45% of this tense · 21st percentile among 17 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s 3 filed years say what it did: revenue went from $3 million in fiscal 2017 to $2 million in fiscal 2019, down 31.5% a year; it rose in 0 of 2 years; the deepest fall was 53% from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2019; net income was positive in 0 of 3 of those years (its annual reports).

What it rests on

revenue growth over the filed span-31.5%bottom 9% of its family
the share of years revenue rosebottom 3% of its family
the share of filed years with a profitbottom 26% of its family
the deepest fall from a revenue peak53.0%bottom 44% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Shareholder treatment

SI estimate

0.8/10

How has it treated the people who own it?

SI estimate 0.8/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 33% of this tense · 8th percentile among 18 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: Read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 8% of 18 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
What the record cannot read: Fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income.
How it was reasoned: one part: the share count over the years, the one part on file, ranked among 18 in its family.
Confidence: 35 of 100
What would change it: A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s shareholder treatment is put at 0.8 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, the share count over the years, which ranks in the bottom 8% of 18 in its family; fewer than two of the parts can be read: the share count over the years, and the cash returned against a positive operating cash flow or net income. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

● Present

What are they doing right now?

2.5/1035% of the headline grade · 3 of 3 filed

Financial health

as filed

3.5/10

Is it financially healthy right now?

ROE -53%: lost 53¢ per shareholder dollar. Leverage 47%: owes 47¢ per asset dollar.

weight 45% of this tense · 35th percentile among 18 sector filers · read for itself

From the record

Return on equity: in the fiscal year ended 2025-12-31, Q/C Technologies, Inc. lost about 53 cents for every dollar of shareholders' money. Leverage: it owed about 47 cents per dollar of assets, and net share issuance: its share count grew 6784.3% over the year (the filed statements).

What it rests on

what it owes per dollar of assetstop 47% of its family
return on equitytop 50% of its family
the share count against the year beforebottom 3% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Industry position

as filed

2.1/10

How strong is its position in its industry?

bottom 21% of 17 in its family; net margin -246.6%.

weight 22% of this tense · 21st percentile among 17 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s standing among 17 graded names in its industry family: revenue of $2 million in fiscal 2019 ranks in the bottom 21% by size; a net margin of -246.6% ranks in the bottom 38%; revenue growth of -31.5% a year over the last 2 filed years ranks in the bottom 3% (its annual reports).

What it rests on

revenue against the family$1.6Mbottom 21% of its family
net margin-246.6%bottom 38% of its family
three-year revenue growth-31.5%bottom 3% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Leadership

as filed

1.4/10

What are the people in charge doing?

bottom 14% of 15 in its family for leadership.

weight 33% of this tense · 14th percentile among 15 sector filers · read for its shareholders

From the record

Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s leadership, from its insiders' filings and its current reports: no one files under a chief executive's title, so that part is not read; the 9 officers and directors filing in the last fifteen months have been on the record a median of 2.4 years (bottom 18%); 11 officer or director changes were reported on Form 8-K since 2023-11-13, against the 9 people in charge now (bottom 10%; fewer changes for each person reads higher) (the Form 4 record, its Form 8-K reports). Years count from a person's first filing in the SEC's data sets, which begin in 2006, so each is a floor.

What it rests on

officer and director changes on Form 8-K, against the people in charge11 in three years among 9 peoplebottom 10% of its family
the median years the people in charge have filed2.4 yearsbottom 18% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

▶ Future

What are they set up to do next?

4.7/1040% of the headline grade · 1 of 3 filed, 2 estimated

Room to expand

SI estimate

4.2/10

How much room does it have to grow?

SI estimate 4.2/10, confidence 35 of 100 (one part).

weight 33% of this tense · 42nd percentile among 18 sector filers · read for itself

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: Read from one part only, cash less debt against assets, which ranks in the bottom 42% of 18 in its family; the record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue.
What the record cannot read: The record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue.
How it was reasoned: one part: cash less debt against assets, the one part on file, ranked among 18 in its family.
Confidence: 35 of 100
What would change it: A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s room to expand is put at 4.2 of 10 with a confidence of 35 of 100, because read from one part only, cash less debt against assets, which ranks in the bottom 42% of 18 in its family; the record does not carry two of the four parts: cash less debt against assets, cash from operations less capital spending against revenue, gross margin, research against revenue. A filing that carries the missing parts replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

Growth drivers

as filed

4.7/10

What could actually drive growth from here?

bottom 47% of 17 in its family for growth drivers.

weight 45% of this tense · 47th percentile among 17 sector filers · read for its customers

From the record

Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s growth drivers, from the filed years to fiscal 2019: revenue grew -31.5% a year over the last three filed years against -31.5% over all 3, speeding up (top 37% of its family); the newest year grew -5.3% (bottom 26%); research spending grew -27.4% a year (bottom 9%); capital spending grew 26.8% a year (top 10%) (its annual reports). Q/C Technologies, Inc. tags no split of its revenue by line in the annual report on file, so growth by line cannot be read here; research and capital spending are on the trend.

What it rests on

three-year growth against the whole span+0.0 points a yeartop 37% of its family
the newest year's revenue growth-5.3%bottom 26% of its family
three-year growth of research spending-27.4%bottom 9% of its family
three-year growth of capital spending26.8%top 10% of its family

A production reading, recomputed from the filings on every data build, read from EDGAR Nov 13, 2026.

Expectations vs reality

SI estimate

5.5/10

Did its newest year beat what its own record pointed to?

SI estimate 5.5/10, confidence 20 of 100 (family median).

weight 22% of this tense · 50th percentile among 16 sector filers · read for its shareholders

SI estimate Inferred, not read as filed

Why it is an estimate: The record does not carry four filed years of revenue and two of the three parts: revenue against the prior pace, earnings against the prior average, the margin change, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 16 members with one.
What the record cannot read: The record does not carry four filed years of revenue and two of the three parts: revenue against the prior pace, earnings against the prior average, the margin change.
How it was reasoned: family median, 16 readings behind it.
Confidence: 20 of 100
What would change it: Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

From the record

SI estimate, not a filed reading: Q/C Technologies, Inc.'s expectations vs reality is put at 5.5 of 10 with a confidence of 20 of 100, because the record does not carry four filed years of revenue and two of the three parts: revenue against the prior pace, earnings against the prior average, the margin change, so the desk assumes the typical reading of its industry family, the median of 16 members with one. Its next annual report on file with the inputs replaces this estimate with the filed reading.

The grade is the company against its own industry, from its filings. It is not a view on the share price. How the grade is made

SI Assistanton QCLS · research, not advice